Sequential (145) fields codes being changed

https://johnchihau.blogspot.com/2026/04/john-take-look_01356192742.html?m=1

.

Ref: https://johnchihau.blogspot.com/2026/04/blog-post_28.html?m=1

.

.
.

Int a;

Int b;

.

If (a = b)

{

Interrupt setting-A

Interrupt setting-B

Interrupt setting-C

}

.

John : The code above can't work in reality.  

Me (stunned): can't work?

John: No, it can't.  In reality,  the system must break the code above down into 3 parts else it can't work. They are,

.

____

Int a;

Int b; <--- The system break it down into 3 parts.  They are b[A], b[B], b[C] respectively. 

.

If (a = b [A])

{

Interrupt setting-A

}

___

If (a = b [B])

{

Interrupt setting-B

}

___

If (a = b [C])

{

Interrupt setting-C

}

___

Me: It's very clumsy.

.

John : Being Clumsy is a must.

.

Me: In another words,  compare-A, compare-B and compare-C are 3 independent data-registers.

John : Yes, they are. Meanwhile,  Interrupt setting-A, Interrupt setting-B and Interrupt setting-C are 3 independent data-register as well.

Me: In another words,  it must be 1 to 1. It couldn't be 1 to many.

John: It's true. There're 6 independent data-registers.